1
2	Overview Review/History Operational Concerns Evaluation Process
3	Review Existing MISO/MAPP Seams Operating Agreement extended to January 31, 2009. MAPP members encountering a large number of schedule curtailments. MAPP members find it increasingly difficult to get transmission service. MISO expressed disappointment over the amount of generation re-dispatch within the market.
4	Review Began with five options in 2007: Seams Operating Agreement with re-dispatch. Generation & loads into MISO Market without moving the transmission facilities. Generation, loads, and transmission into the MISO Market without joining. MISO Transmission Owner. Seek further alternatives.
5	Review Options were evaluated on five Critical Criteria: Flexibility Rate Stability Durability Cost Effectiveness Delivery Reliability
6	Process Delay
7	Review Webpage: http://www.wapa.gov/ugp/PowerMarketing/MISOSeams/
8	Timelines
9	Operational Concerns Operational Concerns Low Hydro Generation. Purchase Power Availability. Congestion and TLRs. Evolving Market/Customer Situations.
10	Low Hydro Generation
11	Low Hydro Generation
12	Purchase Power Availability
13
14	Purchase Power Availability Sources of Energy
15	Congestion and TLRs
16	Congestion and TLRs
17	Congestion and TLRs
18	Congestion and TLRs
19	Congestion and TLRs
20	Congestion and TLRs
21
22	Evolving Market/Customer Situations
23	Evolving Market/Customer Situations
24	Evolving Market/Customer Situations
25	Evolving Market/Customer Situations
26	Evolving Market/Customer Situations Regulation and wind generation development.
27	Evolving Market/Customer Situations FERC 890 changes to the Tariff. Alternatives to be evaluated.
28	Evaluation Process
29	Module F March 4, 2008, MISO filed with FERC a revision to its Tariff that presented the MISO options: Module F Part II – Interconnected Operations and Congestion Management Service. Module F Part III – Market Coordination Service.
30	Alternatives Alternatives identified to date: Module F Part II – a seams agreement including redispatch of generation. Module F Part III – a service agreement where generation and loads from the current WAUE balancing area would be in the MISO market. Other - such as joining the Southwest Power Pool (SPP).
31	Evaluation Process
32	Evaluation Process
33	Analysis Including Policy Review
34	Additional Customer Concerns
35	Study Work
36	Study Assumptions
37	Technical Study Review Team Technical Study Review Team
38	To Do List Maintain a webpage and post all materials http://www.wapa.gov/ugp/PowerMarketing/MISOSeams/ (Currently available). Schedule customer meetings as needed. Customer input (June - July 08). Respond to comments and questions not addressed at the meetings by e-mails and postings to webpage. Send letter to customers announcing decision (mid-Sept 08). Await outcome of transmission public process. Implement decision (Jan 09 – April 09).
39	Questions
40	Comments