![]() |
||
|
|
This column features helpful information, innovative equipment, systems and applications utilities around the nation can use to save energy and improve service. Pressure-independent valves: Do they save energy? Two-way modulating valves are commonly used in variable and constant volume HVAC hydronic systems to control the flow of water through coils depending on room temperature requirements. Various actions—such as adjusting a valve or changing the pump speed—affect pressure in the distribution system. These actions in turn affect flow through a conventional two-way valve even if the load does not change, and may change the temperature in the space. The thermostat responds and the valve modulates to bring the flow back to what is required to meet the load. Until the flow is corrected, the coil operates at an off-design point and will over- or under-condition the space. Operating differences With a “pressure-independent” valve this off-design point operation will not happen. The valve responds only to a signal from a thermostat indicating that the load has changed. A pressure-independent valve will not “feel” the operation of other equipment on the system. By responding only to the change in load, the pressure-independent valve is “self-balancing"—it delivers the proper amount of flow to meet the requirements of the load regardless of the state of other components of the system. Possible benefits The potential advantages pressure-independent valves offer over conventional two-way modulating valves include:
Potential energy savings The following energy-saving claims have been made about pressure-independent valves:
These energy savings claims have not been verified in an independent and controlled study that isolates the effect of the valve replacement from other modifications made at the same time, such as removing bypasses. Nevertheless, it is safe to say that, to the extent that its automatic balancing features reduce overflows, pressure-independent valve will save pumping energy compared to an oversized conventional valve. However, installing pressure-independent valves to replace properly sized and tuned conventional two-way valves in a stable system will likely have little benefits in energy savings, comfort, maintenance or equipment life. Other considerations The decision to replace existing valves with pressure-independent valves should be made carefully because they cost more and may not have significant energy or non-energy benefits in all applications. Particularly in existing systems with conventional two-way modulating valves, problems such as low-temperature differentials or flow instability should be confirmed before replacing them with pressure-independent valves. Likewise, several alternate strategies in common practice can be used to reduce flow instability. The bottom line The above cautions aside, pressure-independent valves may save energy in a system that is not properly sized and tuned, especially combined with other improvements such as removing bypasses. Also, the automatic balancing feature can potentially save on labor and design costs of new systems, in addition to energy savings in the right applications. The additional cost of pressure independent valves is at least partially offset by eliminating balancing valves. Some valve
manufacturers provide design
and consulting services to
customers. They can help
facilities achieve significant
energy savings with a variety
of system improvements in
addition to pressure-independent
valves, such as eliminating
bypasses, removing balancing
and pressure regulating valves,
placing differential sensors
and optimizing fan energy. |
|